By Sam Grobart, Bloomberg Businessweek

At the Hack In the Box conference in Amsterdam, security consultant Hugo Teso demonstrated PlaneSploit, an app he developed that he claims can take control of certain systems aboard an airplane and cause it to change direction or just crash itself into the ground.

Hugo’s no terrorist, mind you. He developed the app to point out the glaring, frightening, insane security holes in most planes’ onboard flight systems. His demonstration was done in a simulated environment, but the methods and effects, he says, are exactly the same as what could happen with a real plane.

“The complete attack will be accomplished remotely, without needing physical access to the target aircraft at any time,” wrote Teso in his presentation abstract for the conference. The hack exploits the plane’s autopilot, transferring control to the hacker, who (in theory) could command the plane from an app running on Android.

The site Help Net Security describes the process in bland, chilling detail:

“The attacker can click on any active airplane and it receives its identification, current location and final destination. In case a nearby airplane system is exploitable (a number of vulnerability vectors mentioned, not much details provided), the application alerts the user via an in-application alert or a push message. The payload can be uploaded with a tap of a button and from that point on, the flight management system is remotely controlled by an attacker.”

Teso says he has been in contact with several members of the airline/aircraft industry and that they are working on addressing these deficiencies. One should hope so.

The website The Daily Caller has published a response from the FAA:

“The FAA is aware that a German information technology consultant has alleged he has detected a security issue with the Honeywell NZ-2000 Flight Management System (FMS) using only a desktop computer,” said Les Dorr, FAA spokesman, in a statement to The DC.

“The FAA has determined that the hacking technique described during a recent computer security conference does not pose a flight safety concern because it does not work on certified flight hardware,” he said.

“The described technique cannot engage or control the aircraft’s autopilot system using the FMS or prevent a pilot from overriding the autopilot,” said Dorr.

“Therefore, a hacker cannot obtain ‘full control of an aircraft,’ as the technology consultant has claimed,” said Dorr.

 

aboard

na palubě

alert

upozornit, varovat

app

aplikace

bland

mírný, nejasný

claim

tvrdit

exploitable

využitelný

FAA (Federal Aviation Administration)

Federální úřad pro letectví

flight management system

letový řídící systém

glaring

evidentní, do očí bijící

hack

nabourání se (do systému)

mind you

mějte na paměti

onboard flight system

palubní řídící systém

override

přejít na ruční ovládání

payload

placený náklad (letadla)

pose concern

představovat problém

spokesman

tiskový mluvčí

remotely

na dálku

tap

poklepnutí

vulnerability

zranitelnost

 

Klikli jste na článek, který patří do předplatitelské sekce HN.cz
Chcete si přečíst celý článek?